The cage culture of coral reef fishes and other fishes

in Sabah, Malaysia*

 

Rooney E. Biusing[1], Michael Phillips[2], and Annadel S. Cabanban[3]

 

Abstract

The cage culture and live fish trade of coral reef fishes and other marine species in Sabah contributes to the production of aquaculture for Malaysia.   In has been in Sabah only in the last 10 years but the operations have generated income of RM 403,000 in 1993 (1 US $ = 2.5 RM), representing 6.8% of the national volume that was exported.   This contribution increased to 15.2% in 1994.   The potential for aquaculture in Sabah, including cage culture and the live-fish trade for coral reef fishes and other marine species, is great.   Various aspects of the industry was studied under the formulation of the Master Plan for Aquaculture in Sabah by the Department of Fisheries, Sabah (DoF) and the Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific. Surveys of cage culture areas and questionnaires were used in the study.   The aspects pertaining to the culture and live fish trade of coral reef fishes and other marine organisms are excerpted and presented here.   Cage culture operations are of the cultivating type and holding type.   Fingerlings of groupers (7 spp.), wrasses (2 spp.), snappers (as least 3 spp.), and trevallies (2 spp.) were taken from the wild.  Fingerlings of seabass (Lates calcarifer) are the only seeds produced in the Tanjung Tajuk Hatchery of the DoF.  The fingerlings are stocked in two types of cages: cultivating type for 8-12 months until about 500 g to 1.2 kg; holding type for 3-7 days in transit for domestic or international markets.   The yields of the cultivating type are low primarily due to the insufficient supply of fingerlings of coral reef fishes from the wild and the seabass fingerlings from the hatchery.   The economic analysis of the cage culture in Sandakan Bay show those small-scale cultivating farms are operating at a loss while the commercial holding type cages are profitable.  The survival of the small-scale farms is due to subsidies on cages, boats, and unpaid family labour. The commercial farms are profitable due to the high market prices of live fishes despite the cost of transport.   Development of breeding and hatchery is one of the recommendations put forward to increase the productivity of small-scale cultivating cage farms.

 

Introduction

The export of marine fishes, particularly coral reef fishes, from Malaysia is a significant component in the income from marine fish production.  The export has been increasing from 200 MT in 1990 to 800 MT in 1994 (Figure 1).   This quantity was valued at RM 200,000 and RM 700,000, respectively, and is economically important.

Export of marine fishes for the live fish trade from Sabah only began in the last 10 years.   However, records of this development and of cage culture are few and not readily available.   In 1993, the value of the exported products of grouper, seabass, snapper, and red Tilapia was about RM 403,000, representing 6.8% of the national volume exported.   In 1994, this contribution increased to 15.2%.

 

Figure 1.  Increasing quantity and value of export of live fishes from Malaysia and the constribution of Sabah in 1993 and 1994


The live fish trade particularly of coral reef fishes in the region has been both good for the economies of these countries but is also brought environmental concerns and resource management issues (e. g., Johannes and Riepen, 1995; Rubec, 1988).  In order to utilise sustainably the coral reef resources in Sabah for the live fish trade, the culture, marketing, and the constraints in the cage culture of coral reef fishes were included in the preparation of the Masterplan for Aquaculture in Sabah.   Excerpts of the findings of the study conducted are presented here.

Data presented here were collected through detailed questionnaires that were administered to aquaculturists in Sandakan and Tawau.    Additional data were collected from workshops held in these two locations.   The information on aquaculture was also gathered through review of secondary knowledge, collected from governmental organisations and other sources, extensive consultations with individuals from government and semi-government organisations and the private sector, and field visits to aquaculture farms and coastal areas of Sabah.

Species cultured

A variety of fishes are cultured in cages in Sabah.  Eleven species are coral reef fishes belonging to the families Serranidae, Lutjanidae, and Labridae (Table 1).  In addition 3 non-coral reef species are also cultured, namely, 2 species of Carangidae, Caranx sexfasciatus and C. malabaricus, and one species of Latidae, Lates calcarifer.

It is a common practice in all the districts to culture several fishes together in cages.  The composition of fishes in the cages is dependent on the availability from wild sources.  For example, in Kudat, fish-farmers can culture the wrasse, Cheilinus undulatus, with other coral reef fishes because it is common there. 


Table 1.   Species of fishes cultured in marine fish cages in Sabah

Species

Common Name

Location

Importance

CORAL REEF FISHES

 

 

 

Family Labridae

Tuskfishes, wrasses

 

 

Cheilinus undulatus

Humphead wrasse, Napoleon wrasse, Maori wrasse

Kudat, Semporna, Tuaran

Major species

Choerodon schoenleinii

Black-spot tuskfish,

Green wrasse

Kudat, Semporna

 

Family Lutjanidae

Snappers

 

 

Lutjanus argentimaculatus

Mangrove red snapper

Beaufort, Pitas, Sandakan, Tuaran

Major species

L. johnii

John’s snapper, Golden snapper

Beaufort, Pitas, Sandakan, Tuaran

Major species

Lutjanid sp.

Red snapper

Beaufort, Kudat, Pitas, Sandakan, Tuaran

 

Family Serranidae

Groupers, coral trout

 

 

Cephalopholis miniata

Vermillion grouper

Kudat, Semporna, Tuaran

 

C. sonnerati

Tomato rockcod

Semporna

 

 

 

 

 

Cromileptes altivelis

Humpback grouper,

Mouse grouper

Kudat, Semporna

Major species

Epinephelus tauvina

Greasy grouper

All districts

Major species

E. bleekeri

Bleeker’s grouper,

dusky tail grouper

Semporna, Kudat

 

E. malabaricus

(or altifontalis)

Malabar grouper,

Green grouper

Sandakan, Kuala Penyu

 

Plectropomus leopardus

Leopard coral trout,

Blue-spotted seabass

Kudat, Semporna

Major species

NON-CORAL REEF FISHES

 

 

 

Family Carangidae

Jacks, Trevallies

 

 

Carangoides malabaricus

Malabar trevally

Kudat, Sandakan, Tuaran

 

Caranx sexfasciatus

Bigeye trevally

All districts

Major species

Family Latidae

Seabass

 

 

Lates calcarifer

Seabass

Pitas, Tuaran

 

 

Aquaculture Practices and Management

Source of Fry/Juveniles

Live fish culture is highly dependent on seeds from the wild; hatchery production of the marine fish industry is new.   Cage culture for coral reef fishes relies entirely on the supply of wild seed that are caught by fish traps, long lines, hooks and gill nets.  Poisons like sodium cyanide is used occasionally to catch fry or juveniles but these have low survival rates.   For other fishes like Lates calcarifer, the Department of Fisheries in Tanjung Badak, has produced 11,000 fingerlings in 1993 but this did not meet the demand of the operators.

Fingerlings are either taken from the wild or bought, depending on the size of operations.  Small-scale operators collect target species of fingerlings from their catches as fishermen or buying these from other fishermen.   This is done by cage-farmers in most districts (Table 2).   Large-scale operations purchase fingerlings and marketable-sized fish from fishermen.

Culture Systems

Coral reef fishes are cultured in two types of cages for the live-fish export market.  The (1) cultivating type is used for growing-out for periods of 3-12 months or more and (2) holding type is used for temporary culture for 2-10 days while waiting for export.  Fishes from the cultivating type cages are sold to operators of holding-type cages.  In some cases, operators use both type of cages and statistics do not distinguish the two types.

The marine cages used in Sabah are simple and practical.  The cages are box-shaped with nets made of polyethylene line and mesh sizes ranging from 0.5” to 3” or 4”.   Two to four cages are set within a raft frame.  Small cages (1 m3) are used for nursing small fishes while the larger cages (up to 93 m3) are for cultivation of larger fish.  The cages are covered with nets to prevent fish from jumping out (especially during rough weather) and for keeping bird and mammalian predators out.

The number of cages per farm is variable, ranging from small-scale operators with two cages, to large operators with >10 cages.  The basic features of these operations are summarised in Tables 2 and 3.

 

Table 2.  Characteristics of marine fish cage operations surveyed in Sabah

Features

Districts

 

Beaufort

Kuala Penyu

Kudat

Pitas

Sandakan

Semporna

Tuaran

Number of farmers surveyed

1

2

2

1

10

2

1

Average cage volume (m3)

12.1

27

8.7

16.2

13.8

48.6

1.7

No. net cages/farm

2

2

12

2

5.5

10.5

20

Total volume/farm

24.2

54

104.4

32.4

75.9

520

34

Stocking density

1.5

1.9

23

2.4

.06

6.1

6.6

Average yields (kg/m3/yr)

2.1

2.2

34.5

3.1

1.45

45*

9.8

Survival (%)

80

80-90

70-85

80-90

80-100

80-90

60

Annual production/farm (kg)

50

120

3,600

100

110

23,400

333

Site environment

Saltwater creek

Saltwater creek

Open coast

Mangrove creek

Estuarine/

open coast

Open coast

Estuary

Source of fingerlings

Local catch

Local catch

Local catch

Local catch

Local catch

Local Catch

Local catch

 

Stocking Density

Stocking densities are below the optimum capacity of the cages in all districts.  Fish stocking densities varied considerably from 0.6 kg/m3/yr to 23 kg/m3/yr (Table 2). Several factors affect stocking density, such as the cultured species, fish availability, size-at-stocking, cage dimensions quality of water, velocity of water, and availability of capital.  The availability of fingerlings appear to be the crucial factor that limits stocking density and production in Sabah and this situation is a reflection of the difficulty and availability of obtaining fingerlings to stock cages.

Stocking densities and duration also vary with the type of culture system.  Culture farms use lower stocking densities than the holding cage operation.  In the cultivating type cage, fishes between 100-1,000 g are stocked while in the holding type, 1,000-g or heavier fishes are stocked.   Fishes are kept longer for 3-12 months or more in cultivating cages but only for 2-10 days in holding cages.  

Feeding and Routine Management

Feeding is dependent on the type of culture system.  Feeding is only done in cultivating type cages; holding type cages starve the fishes for a few days prior to transportation.   Trash fish is the main feed used in all finfish cage culture in Sabah.   Some of the species in this group are Sardinella fimbriata, Nemipterus spp., Caranx leptolepis but the composition vary with the fishing ground.  Trash fishes are caught by the farmers or purchased from the catches of trawls, purse seines, lift-nets, and gill nets.  The price of trash fish range from RM 0.20-0.60/kg.   Fresh trash fish costs 10% more than frozen ones.  This feed is available throughout the year, especially near landing sites in Sandakan, Kudat, and Semporna but is sometimes unavailable in areas away from main fish landings like Tuaran.

The feeding rate of caged fish depends on availability of trash fish, size of cultured species or total weight of cultured fish.  The cage operators feed big fish or those near marketable size at 2-4% of body weight every other day.   Small cage farmers feed the small fishes, ranging from 100-300 g, at 3-10% of body weight twice a day.  There is no information on food conversion rate but 5:1 to 10:1 is normal in farms using trash fish.  

Most holding cages in Semporna and Kudat keep fishes for 3-7 days without feeding.  These fishes are kept in the cages for this period for conditioning prior to packing for local and foreign markets.

Maintenance of cages is basic.  Fouling organisms in cages are removed, as these tend to restrict water flow through the cages.

Duration of Culture

The period of culture ranges from 7 days to 12 months but the taken to reach marketable sizes varies according the size at stocking, the species, and the type of cage culture (i. e., shorter period for holding cages and longer period for cultivating cages).   The following practices are observed in the culture of coral reefs fishes:

·         Short culture period – Individuals nearing marketable sizes are purchased and fed for 1-4 weeks.   Individuals that have reached marketable sizes are packed and exported as live fish.  This practice is common in Semporna and Kudat.

·         Variable culture period - Fishes about 7 inches in length and longer (but weighing less than 1,000-1,500 g) are held for variable periods of time, ranging from 1-8 months, depending on the size at stocking.

·         Long culture period – Most of the fishes caught by fishermen for the cage culture are between 2-7 inches in length.  These small fishes take 8-12 months (sometimes more) to reach marketable size.

The snappers, L. argentimaculatus and L. johnii, with initial sizes of 300-600 g generally take 3-6 months to reach marketable size of 500-1,200 g while the grouper, E. tauvina and C. miniata of 150-300 g take 6-12 months to reach the same marketable size.

Survival Rate

The sources of mortality are the method of catching fishes, the stress during at the first week of stocking, and poor quality of water. Small fishes caught by gill net and long lines have high mortality.   Fingerlings caught with sodium cyanide also have high mortality. Farmers report high mortality between 40-70% during the first week of stocking.

Survival of fingerlings in cage culture is high after the acclimation period but slightly varies among species of coral reef fishes and seabass. For Cheilinus undulatus and Choerodon schoenleinii, survival was 60-85% after a 12-month rearing period in Kudat. For Lutjanus spp., Epinephelus spp., and Caranx spp. tend to have survival rates of more than 80% in most areas. Likewise, for hatchery-reared seabass, survival rate of around 80% is reported in Sandakan. However, survival rate of E. tauvina, C. miniata, L. argentimaculatus, and Caranx spp. was lower than the average at 60% in Tuaran. This low survival rate may reflect the poor growing conditions, possibly related to the water quality of this estuarine area which is unsuitable for coral reef fishes that grow naturally in poor-nutrient and clear waters (Sale, 1980).

Farm Production and Yields

Statistics on live fish culture in Sabah is limited to 1993 and 1994.  In 1993, the value of the production was about RM 403 M (Figure 1) that was produced by 86 farmers. In 1994, the production was 800 tonnes by 117 operators. These figures include the production for grouper and snapper as well as non-reef species as seabass and red Tilapia. Marine cage culture production is highest in Sandakan, Kota Kinabalu, and Kudat (Figure 2). All the other districts produce lower than 100 tonnes.

The production statistics in 1994 does not agree with field surveys undertaken by the project (see Table 2). This suggests that the “production” is likely from holding operations that are common; only Tuaran and Beaufort have “culturing type” only. From the survey, the output of the cage culture in Sabah ranged from 50 to 23,400 kg.  The highest production came from Semporna at 23,400 kg from only 2 operators who run holding type system.  The production statistics is more appropriately the output of cage culture in Sabah.

In terms of number of farmers, there are two centres of cage culture in Sabah. Sandakan, in the east coast, has 47 farmers who are working on both holding and culture types.   Tuaran, in the west coast, has 24 farmers who are involved in culture type only. All the other districts have less than 20 farmers working on the industry. Production of live fishes is poorly but positively correlated with the number of farmers (Figure 3) such that Kota Kinabalu, that has only 7 farmers, has produced second largest production at 255 tonnes in 1994 by holding live fishes for export.  This indicates that productivity of the farms is not dependent on the number of farmers but on the type of cage culture and the stocking rate. 

 

Figure 2.  Output of cage culture in all districts in Sabah in 1994


 


Figure 3.  Positive relationship between number of farmers and output of cages in Sabah in 1994

 

To enhance production, the government of Sabah has given incentives to fish-cage culturists. During 1991-1993, the Department of Fisheries provided material support to 20 and training to 46 fishermen and public. KoNelayan, the semi-government cooperative for fishermen, likewise provide similar incentives to promote the involvement of fishermen in cage culture.

The fish yields from cages were variable and depend on stocking density, survival rate, quantity and quality of feed, cage and water management, experience of operator, and the species. The average yields were higher in holding operations up to 45 kg/m3/yr and lower for culture operations, ranging from 1.45-45 kg/m3/yr. The yields in cage culture are lower since the sizes of the individuals are smaller than in holding cages. However, cages that yield less than 10 kg/m3/yr are considered very low yielding. This reflects poor utilisation of cage space with low stocking rates because of shortage of fish seed. Farmers in Kudat and Semporna address this problem by stocking cages with ornamental fishes (Platax spp., Chaetodon spp.) and highly priced lobsters.

Marketing and Economics

Live fish is handled properly in order to ensure the best prices in domestic markets or in Hong Kong. Marketable sizes at about 500 g or bigger but there is no grading done at the farm. Different markets prefer particular sizes. For instance, Hong Kong prefers 600 g to 1.2-kg size for groupers.  Selected individuals for the market are then transported in trunks with aerated seawater tanks to the local market or to holding tanks before export. It is a common practice for live-fish to be held in a tank for 1-2 days without feeding. The temperature is lowered to reduce metabolic rate and oxygen consumption thus decreasing the mortality rate during transportation.

The packaging is crucial as well in ensuring the best prices for the live fishes.  The custom is to pack the live fishes in oxygenated plastic bags at about 4-5 kg of fishes per bag. Four plastic bags are layered for each 4-5 kg of fishes to prevent leakage of seawater. The bags are then packed into styrofoam boxes or in cardboard boxes. Live fish from Sabah are then exported by air.

The economic returns from the cage culture of live fishes are variable among the farms. The costs and returns vary among the districts (Figure 4). The rate of return in 1994 ranges from 25.3% to 35%, equivalent to a net profit of RM 15.00/m3 and RM 66.6/m3.

 


Figure 4.  Economic costs and benefits of cage culture in Sabah

The cage culture in Sandakan was studied in more detail in Sandakan to know the production and economics of culturing live fishes. The analysis is based on 15 cage farmers with a cage culture area calculated on the surface area of all cages in Sandakan Bay in 1995. The results show production of cages, productivity of farms, and income generated by farmers are variable. In this district, the average cage volume is 62.17 m3 (s.d. = 37.87). The surface area of cages per farm ranges from 3.35 to 65.49 m2 or an average of 26.05 m2  (s.d. 10.10). The annual production per farm is 205 kg (s.d. 202) and the average productivity is 3.89 kg/m3/yr (4.07) or 7.88 kg/m2/yr. The farmers quote RM 13.65/kg on average for the live fish in 1995. Thus, the total revenue per farm is RM 2,972.58/farm or RM 56.76/m3/year, or RM 464/acre/year.

Furthermore, the net revenue received by farmers is negative due to the relative higher costs of inputs over revenue as productivity is low (Table 3).  The losses are RM 3,273.11/year/farm, or RM 74.17/m3/year/ or RM 598.755/acre/year. The likely reasons that farms have continued to operate are due to the subsidy on engines and cages and unpaid family labour. The analysis further suggests that small-scale cage farming as practised at present is not a financially sustainable activity unless farmers can increase stocking densities to improve yields and economic returns.  In contrast, holding operations are generally profitable with lesser costs on operations but with high cost on packing and transport.  The costs for packing and transport are greatly offset by the high prices that domestic and international markets pay for the live fishes.

 

Table 3.  Cost components and revenue per farm per acre for cage culture in Sandakan in 1995

Item

Income

 

(per yr/farm)

(per/yr/m3)

(per/yr/acre)

Total Cost 

6,245.69

130.94

1,063.424

     Variable Cost

3,109.17

61.03

504,824

 

Labour

737.02

15.3

122,685

Feed

740.31

14.00

116,081

Seed

766.73

15.58

127,516

Fuel

865.11

16.15

138,542

     Fixed Cost

3,136.52

69.90

558,599

 

Land rent

0.32

.0052

50

Depreciation cost

     (cage, engine, Boat, trap)

2,931.03

65.84

522,009

Opportunity cost of

     Investment

205.17

4.06

36,541

Overhead cost

-

-

-

Total Revenue

2,972.58

56.76

464,668

Profit

- 3,273.11

-74.17

-598,755

Return to land

-3.272.79

-74.16

-598,705

Return to labour

-2,536.09

-58.87

-476,070

Net revenue

- 136.59

-4.27

-40,156

 

Problems in the Industry: Constraints

The problems faced by the live-fish trade of coral reef fishes and other fishes in Sabah are varied, ranging from the technical aspects of culture to the social aspect. These problems impose constraints in the growth of the industry. These problems, that are generally common in all districts, are summarised below.

 

Fish Diseases

Fish diseases are a common occurrence in fish cage culture in Sabah as it is elsewhere (see Chinabut, this volume). Fifty three percent of fish farmers (20) interviewed reported mortality of individuals due to diseases. The diseases found were “reddish skin” (35% of sample), “abdominal inflammation” (35%), “red boil” (20%), “fin rot”, eye infection, and others. Bacterial diseases causing fin rot are attributed to Myxobacter sp. and Vibrio spp.  and Brooklynella sp. These bacteria cause extensive skin damage and subcutaneous bleeding in the estuarine grouper.   

Susceptibility of fishes to diseases is attributed to two factors.   The strong winds during the intermonsoon season appear to set conditions for “tail rot” and eye infection in Semporna. In Pitas, the flood season was correlated with fish eye damage. The use of destructive fishing practices, namely the use of sodium cyanide and fish-bombing, was identified as the reason for fin rot in Kudat (1 farmer). The use of poisons is a possible reason as this poison stuns fish for easy capture and somehow cause morbidity. However, the use of fish-bombs is unlikely reason for fin rot in cage culture: fish-bombed fish hardly survive the damage on the gas bladder as a result of the blast and as such these fishes are could never reach the farmer.

Regular and basic fish health checks were conducted only in Kudat but most farmers in Sabah are not familiar with the proper procedures for maintaining good health in cultured fishes. Even when fish diseases were observed no treatment was applied on affected fishes. In Sandakan, Semporna, Kudat, and Tuaran where skin diseases (fin rot), mouth infection, and eye infection were reported, the affected fishes were taken out of the cages and transferred to another cage. Cages were the diseased fishes had been taken were cleaned.

The mortality of fishes due to diseases is significant and causes loss of income. The losses of income from bacterial diseases was 5% (Sandakan), from fin rot and eye infection was 10% (Semporna), from fin rot alone was 30% (Kudat), and from skin and mouth damage was 60% (in Tuaran; Ostrowski, 1993). 

Water quality

The quality of the water in the cage culture in Sabah is assessed subjectively and no farmer undertakes monitoring of water quality. Poor water quality is a problem in the cage culture of fishes in Sabah. Turbidity or pollution from domestic and industrial sources causes poor water quality in 8 of the 22 farms. Salinity fluctuation was also reported in estuarine areas but salinity changes are natural.

 

Fingerling supply and quality

The shortage and the quality of the fingerlings of coral reef fishes to stock cages are a problem of farmers in Sabah. The shortage of grouper fingerlings was noted in Kudat and in Tuaran (Ostrowski, 1993). The use of sodium cyanide also results to poor quality of the fingerlings that susceptible to diseases and resulting to high mortality. This situation is a reflection of the state of the coral reefs, low recruitment, destructive and unselective fishing, and possibly overfishing.

Fingerlings for L. argentimaculatus and L. calcarifer are also not sufficient. Fingerlings of the seabass produced by Department of Fisheries and Fishermen’s Cooperative (KoNelayan) in the Tanjung Badak Hatchery were distributed to farmers but this was not enough to satisfy demand.  

Environmental Impacts of Wild Juvenile Harvesting

Harvesting of juveniles of coral reef fishes for the cage culture in Sabah can lead to overfishing. With the harvest of young individuals, fewer individuals grow to maturity. The consequence of this growth overfishing is lesser number broodstock and recruitment. Overfishing of coral reef fishes for the cage culture is in a way an indirect effect of the live-fish trade that utilises undersized fish for culture at varying periods prior to marketing.

Poor capture and handling practices can lead to additional destruction of coral reefs (Johannes and Riepen, 1995). Juveniles are captured using sodium cyanide that kills other marine organisms besides corals (Rubec, 1988). The poison is used in combination with a net that is encircled around a coral head or cave. The poison is to stun the fish to facilitate capture. Coral reefs are already facing destruction from fish-bombing in Sabah and further loss of live corals from the local effects of sodium cyanide can contribute to the deterioration of the coral reefs (Ostrowski, 1993).   

The use of poisons and compressed air (hookah) has also detrimental effect on the health of the fishermen.  There are reports of paralysis resulting from anoxia due to contaminated air tubes or a death in one fishing village due to cyanide fishing.       

Social conflict

In addition to the technical problems in the culture of marine fishes, social conflict is also a constraint. The conflicts arise from theft and poaching of cultured marine fishes from cage farms in Sandakan, Semporna, Kuala Penyu, Beaufort, and Kudat. In Sandakan, 30% of farmers had lost fish from poaching. One farmer has lost as many as 380 individuals weighing about 50 kg.  In Semporna, farmers have employed night watches to prevent this problem. In addition to improved security, farmers could cooperate and establish self-help groups as features of future marine aquaculture zones.

Conflicts between farmers and fingerling suppliers also arise due to the high mortality fingerlings. Farmers believe that the fingerlings were caught with sodium cyanide and the resulting mortality translates to financial losses or lower profit margins.

 

Future Directions

Under the Master plan for Aquaculture Development in Sabah, the following are the planned directions for the sustainable growth of cage culture and live fish trade of coral reef fishes. These measures are meant to address insufficient supply of fingerlings, overfishing of juveniles, and destruction of coral reefs that were identified as constraints and problems in the industry. The goal is the conservation of juveniles and adults in the wild and the protection of the coral reef from further destruction. These wide-ranging recommendations are:

 

Supply of fingerlings

The government has already initiated research in breeding and development of hatchery production for marine fishes. Breeding for seabass and snapper (L. argentimaculatus) has been successful. More of these initiatives need to be conducted for the coral reef fishes in order to address the problem of supply of fingerlings and develop the marine cage farming industry in Sabah. In the medium term, a marine hatchery should be established in Semporna. This district is recommended because of the abundance of suitable sites for holding broodstock, diversity of fishes, and has good water quality.

Conservation of Juveniles, Adults, and the Coral Reefs

Several measures were recommended under the Masterplan to conserve juveniles, adults, and the coral reef environment. These include:

a.       assessment of the potential (sustainable) yields of live fish from coastal areas and limitations on target fishing;

b.       exploration of the establishment of marine protected areas with restrictions on live fishes;

c.       restriction of export of certain endangered species (e. g., Napoleon wrasse);

d.       promotion of the involvement of the community in the management of fishery resources; and

e.       awareness-building on sustainable fisheries exploitation and management practices

Conclusion

The cage culture of coral reef fishes and other marine fishes in Sabah generates economic returns for the industry. The commercial holding-type farms but not the small-scale cultivating-type cage farms realise the profit in the cage culture and trading of live fishes. The low productivity of the small-scale cage farms is largely due to the insufficient supply of fingerlings to stock and maximise the use of the cages. This constraint can be addressed by developing breeding and hatchery facilities for coral reef fishes and other marine fishes. This solution is recommended in conjunction with the protection of coral reefs from further destructive fishing practices and with the management of utilisation of populations from further overexploitation.

 

Acknowledgement

The paper is based on the Masterplan for Aquaculture Development in Sabah (MAL/93/013) developed by the Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific and the Department of Fisheries Sabah. The authors are grateful for the assistance of many farmers, government officials, and other individuals who contributed information to the study and guidance in the overall preparation of the Aquaculture Masterplan.

 

References

Department of Fisheries Malaysia.  1990-1994.  Annual Fisheries Statistics. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Fisheries Sabah. 1993-1994. Annual Fisheries Statistics. Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.

Johannes, R. E. and M. Riepen.  1995. Environmental, economic and social implications of the live fish trade in Asia and the West Pacific. The Nature Conservancy, Honolulu, Hawaii.  87 pp.

Ostrowski, B. F. 1993.  Potential for hatchery production of marine finfish suitable for coastal aquaculture in Sabah. In Ostrowski, B. F. Arbian Hj. Kafir, and Almah Awaluddin (eds.)  Proc. Seminar on Aquaculture Issues in Sabah. Jointly organised by Ko-Nelayan, Sabah and Faculty of Science and Natural Resources, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Sabah Campus.  Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.

Rubec, P. J. 1988. The need for conservation and management of Philippine coral reefs. Env. Biol. Fishes 23:141-154.

Sale, P. F. 1980. The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Ocean. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev.  367-421.

 



* Excerpted from Masterplan for Aquaculture Development in Sabah (Mal/93/013): Final Report, Department of Fisheries, Sabah and Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific, July 1996

[1] Fisheries Research Centre, Department of Fisheries, Sabah, 89400 Likas, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

[2] Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific, Kasetsart, Bangkok 10903, Thailand

[3] Borneo Marine Research Unit, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88999 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia